Obama cites Australia’s gun confiscation……..

Without the most base understanding that their gun control cabal is just as fundamentally ignorant as ours is.

“My biggest frustration so far is the fact that this society has not been willing to take some basic steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who can do just unbelievable damage. We’re the only developed country on earth where this happens. And it happens now once a week. And it’s a one-day story. There’s no place else like this,” the president said. 

“A couple of decades ago Australia had a mass shooting similar to Columbine or Newtown, and Australia just said, ‘Well, that’s it. We’re not doing — we’re not seeing that again,’ and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since. I mean, our levels of gun violence are off the charts. There’s no other advanced, developed country on earth that would put up with this,” Obama added.

Of course, he doesn’t mention the third rail of the gun control cabal……confiscation. But that’s exactly what occurred in Australia.

The anti-liberty sycophants from down under suffer from the same fundamental ignorance about the issues that they’re so petulantly vociferous about, as does our very own gun control cabal.

Not really sure if I should giggle at the stupid…or weep for humanity……


159 thoughts on “Obama cites Australia’s gun confiscation……..

  1. There was a lot of German Catholic “look the other way” concerning the German socialist atrocities of the mid-20th century…. going very high up into the Roman Catholic heirarchy, unfortunately.

    And religion and left-wing fascism also were hand in hand in the once-trendy “liberation theology” of the 1980s. It was essentially “Soviet Imperialism for Christ”… not grassroots. of course, but greated by the KGB.


    Hundreds of thousands died in the Soviet colonial efforts against Latin America in the time from the end of WW2 to the fall of the USSR.

    Chavez and his successor and Evo Morales have been trying to bring high levels of misery and slaughter to Latin Amercia to continue the bad effort, but it has been a lot harder for them without “Daddy Moscow” to unite them and fund it.


  2. Now, let's steer this back on track

    Definition of fascism:
    “fas·cism (făsh′ĭz′əm)
    1. often Fascism
    a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
    b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
    2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

    Many definitions of “Fascism” contain the qualifier “right-wing”, which is the most superficial characteristic, a sort of window dressing. That is why I use the term 'left-wing fascism” to refer to the left-type of fascism (in reference to the more proper definition I quoted above) or to refer to a system which is identical to the fascism in some definitions (which requires “right wing”) but lacking this least important qualifier.

    Because when the government is taking away your rights, does it matter much at all if it is in the name of Karl Marx's scriptures (left fascism) or to empower the Fuhrer (right-fascism) ?

    Australia's gun policy definitely falls under the definition of fascism, as it involves “centralization of authority” over the personal decision of firearm ownership.


  3. They need to have a vote. a referendum, on confiscation….

    But they know they would lose big.

    I am reminded of in Michigan, the unions pushed through a ballot initiative, which they billed as a referendum on collective bargaining. It included all kinds of awful things, including banning school districts from firing teachers who teach while drunk.

    As a referendum on labor unions in general, it was strongly rejected by voters. It resulted in the legislature afterwards banning forcing workers to join against their will.

    Big backfire….


  4. Fascism is designed to have a broad appeal. However both secular progressive fascism and hypernationalist “traditionalist” (I use that term loosely, see below) fascism seek to suppress personal freedom in favor of the impersonal group (be it community, nation, religion or race).

    Social conservatism in Fascism is not the same as social conservatism in conservatism. Tradition is more or less “zombified” to serve the Fascist mob. Fascists believe that the that the family is nothing more than a cog in the greater Reich, and demand that the needs of the Reich come before the family. They maintain tight control over families by deciding who can marry who, usually for racial reasons, and indoctrinating children to believe that Reich comes before family.

    A fascinating view of how tenuous family really is under Fascism comes from Melita Maschmann, whose account was featured heavily in the show Last Days of the Nazis.


  5. Son: It is interesting how the definition of socialism given in a comment above:

    “Socialism: a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.”

    is ultra-fascist, as in this, the rulers own all property, and the people, none. One must truly be a sort of nihilistic sociopath to actually want this system.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s